Argumentative Essay #4: “Should American families have a two child max rule to limit population growth?”

Overpopulation has been a concern since Thomas Malthus wrote his famous Essay on the Principle of Population in 1798. Malthus suggested that in case the Earth’s population continues to grow at a then existing rate, in the short time it will result in catastrophe caused by the lack of food. However, time proved him to be wrong as he did not take into account the development of technology. Nevertheless, the issue of overpopulation has not lost its relevance in our ages.

One of methods to limit the population growth was introduced in China with the one-child policy in the late seventies. However, since this policy led to the disparity in the sex ratio at birth, with males outnumbering females, it was amended in 2015, and nowadays Chinese citizens can have two children. The question arises, should we adopt the same policy in the United States? In my opinion, there is no reason for it. According to the CIA World Factbook, American families have 1-2 children on average, while to sustain population levels they should have more than two children. Therefore, there is no need to limit childbearing in the United States.

Another reason for not adopting family planning policy is the ethical problem it causes. This kind of policy inevitably violates human rights and freedom. When the state coerces an individual to have a definite number of offsprings, it significantly bounds human’s right to plan his own life and to make decisions concerning his future and family. Such decision, if adopted, will cause the American society’s outrage and social instability. This is why I do not consider it right to adopt two-child policy in the United States.

In conclusion, the idea of family planning adopted at the governmental level is not acceptable to the American society for ethical reasons. Moreover, I believe that there is no necessity for its implementation in the USA.

Author's Note: argumentative essay writing process isn't all sunshine and rainbow, but before you give up, or look for essays for sale, or google for a guide to buying papers online, give it a try, and if nothing works, go and contact essay services.

Argumentative Essay #3: "Gun Control"

Although, this is a pretty controversial topic, I'll try to clearly show my point of view on the topic using argumentative essay writing strategies as well as JW essay samples.

Regular media coverage of mass shootings happening across America has triggered polarizing reactions from the American public. A sizable number of people believe strongly in holding on to their guns. They consider any action by the government to control guns as an attempt to control their lives. On the other hand, pro-gun control groups want strict regulations and thorough background checks to ensure that guns do not go to wrong hands. Between these two arguments, there is a real issue that no one is talking about, the underlying reasons for such attacks.

With globalization and advancement of technology, the American middle class is being displaced. People without the right set of skills are unable to find well-paying jobs, leading to unequal distribution of income and wealth in the society. Inequality in the society leads to increased mental illness. When such individuals have easy access to guns, the guns end up being used for anti-social purposes.

Traditionally, low-income areas have higher crime rates. Gun users residing in high crime areas may be impacted by tougher gun regulations as they may not be able to protect themselves effectively.

Hence, the Americans will have to dig deeper into the gun control issue as there is more to this issue than what meets the eye. There have to be compromises made on both sides of the argument. Americans have to come together as a nation to look into the gun control issue holistically. There are various factors that are leading to frequent mass shootings in the country. America has all the resources to solve this problem. The only thing that is lacking is the political will.

Argumentative Essay #2: “Is the person without knowledge of computers handicapped?”

It is true that the infrastructure of our society now favors the use of computers and hand-held devices. This is apparent in the dearth of conveniences such as pay phones, physical maps or phone books. One can still find pay phones at gas stations, buy physical maps at tourist stands or periodically receive free phone books, but this is not the way the new generations prefer to navigate the world. For older generations, the lack of well-known conveniences can be startling and can put them out of touch with the world.

For example, newspaper classifieds are not frequently used by young people these days. If a millennial wants to sell his TV, he typically goes online to sites such as Craigslist or uses a Yahoo or Facebook group meant for such transactions. The baby boomer who wants to sell her TV would be more likely to call the newspaper to place an ad in the printed edition. But would she reach the greatest audience this way? If all of the younger folks—who are surely looking for all kinds of bargains until they are financially stable—don’t look at the printed advertisements, our hypothetical baby boomer will have a difficult time selling her TV.

One could argue that not knowing how to read a physical map or use a pay phone is a disadvantage as well. After all, smart phones are only useful as long as their batteries hold a charge. The fast-paced transition to a technology-based society has left both sides of the generational gap with deficits in skills and knowledge.

But to say that a person without knowledge of computers is handicapped is a bit of a stretch. It is possible to live a full and happy life without being saturated with technology. It is only a disadvantage when technical skills are absolutely necessary, with no alternative option, and even then it’s easy to find help. But isn’t that the same with any kind of skill? Where is the line drawn between unskilled and handicapped? It’s a disservice to people classified as handicapped under legal terms to bandy the term around.

Argumentative Essay #1: “Is the UN prepared for another world war?”

The world seems to be preparing a grand alliance against a common enemy. It appears that the United Nations Security Council and other countries of NATO are adopting resolutions aimed at all UN countries to unite against Isis. Some are asking if this indeed is a declaration of World War III, while others are uncertain if the world or the United Nations are prepared for another World War with so many unresolved issues present among these nations.

It must be stressed that to date no war declaration has been made by any United Nation representative, however based on the UN's Security Councils bylaws which say that when five countries or more get together against a common target this may be considered as a world war. Resolutions across the globe are short and strong, and focused on one primary goal to fight against the common enemy. Both old and new world news continues to shed light on a second concern; is the United Nations prepared (tactically) for a World War? With over 5000 troops from the US and NATO conducting the largest airborne exercises in Europe since the Cold War, and with Germany going as far as recruiting class room students, it’s safe to say at least two countries of the United Nations are pulling no stops to be prepared.

In conclusion, it’s clear with so many nations involved that it would seem counterproductive to not be armed in ready for a war of such magnitude. Ultimately the side better prepared strategically would seem to have an advantage. But have we prepared ourselves with enough Intel to defend against what seems to be an invisible opponent. Our common enemy Isis, could very well be the person standing next to you, and if that were so, who would be better prepared?

The Basic Structure of an Argumentative Essay

An argumentative essay is a short piece of writing that tackles a specific subject. Often it requires an opinion based on objective facts on the chosen subject. An argumentative essay, is not merely pouring out one’s thoughts on a topic, nor is it a retelling of researched facts. It involves an equal amount of research and a methodical analysis and reflection on the subject matter; and although creativity is encouraged, writers still need to adhere to the essay structure.

Essays have a fixed structure to help the writer stay on track to his/her topic as well as to help the reader understand the essay easier. The basic structure of an essay is composed of an introduction, the body, and the conclusion.

The introduction is where the tone of the rest of the essay is set. It gives a general overview of the topic and the points or arguments in the essay. The argument is usually revealed through the thesis statement. Longer essays may also explain the method of argument used or the main essay structure. 

The introduction should show what the essay has to contribute to the topic. It is the first thing that the reader will see, thus it is what will decide whether the reader will go on reading the essay or not. Therefore, the introduction should be brief and concise but interesting.

The body is the main meat of the essay. It is where the main argument or the thesis statement is dissected, explained, and supported with data from research. The writer may also include his/her own thoughts and opinions in this part. The body should have its own structure apart from the basic structure of an essay.

The final part of an essay is the conclusion. It is what closes the essay by reviewing the points or arguments and the writer’s opinion again and tying them all up. Unlike the introduction which contains the thesis statement and the method used in analyzing the materials, the conclusion has the thesis statement and the data and the opinion of the writer. The conclusion should also be kept short as the main points should have already been expounded on the body; the conclusion is just a recap.

A good essay structure sample is one that has three paragraphs (but still, the number shouldn't be limited to three) one for each part, and although it is possible to have more depending on the needs of the topic. Ultimately, the decision will be in the hands of the writer.